The Loss of Honor
Responding to an episode of Simon Sinek’s podcast again… We are missing a lot without honor. I agree that honor is about maintaining moral standards and gentleperson-like behavior. And many religious people who claim to have moral standards rarely have honor. Honor is not necessarily about being of service or being necessary but it’s definitely about not being a harm to society and being a standup citizen. I think the problem we have with the IDF today as opposed to all that we hear from the US army about people being professional, wanting to be there, and being very honorable and easily sacrificing for each other and the greater good, is that in the IDF, we claim to have high moral standards but the soldiers themselves, from what we see in the news, are very dishonorable. Which is funny in a country where one of the most celebrated movies with one of the most celebrated songs is one about honor.
Posted in No Category by Eran with no comments yet.
19 Years
This blog has been up for 19 years counting last Monday. Of course, avid readers remember that I had a blog before this which I made in high school so I’ve been blogging closer to 25 years. This years has been… a thing. I’m just tired about everything. For many reasons. I’m sure you can relate to at least some.
Posted in No Category and tagged blog by Eran with comments disabled.
The Power of a Dog
by Rudyard Kipling and Eran Arbel I love and despise the original song for what it means and I always come back to it.However, despite it still being very strong, I find that it has aged very badly in several respects.So, here’s my riff on it. There is sorrow enough in the natural wayFrom the assholes and dipshits that fill our day;And when we are certain of sorrow in store,Why do we always arrange for more?Fellow Humans, I bid you bewareOf giving your heart to a dog to tear. Adopt a pup and you will recieveLove so strong, undying, that you cannot concieve.With a dog in your life, it’s hard to burn outWhen you can always see, joy in a snoutNevertheless it is hardly fairTo risk your heart for a dog to tear. When those precious years, far too little,Are growing shorter and slower, it’llBe hard to be happy, when that little pupper,Now a tired senior, eating a last supper.Then you will find, that you need to bearThat you’ve given your heart to a dog to tear. When the creature you nurtured, played with its paws,Who greeted you daily, morning, evening, because,When the body runs its course, and will is depleted,You have to let go, father time undefeated.Allow the vet, the final dose, to administerFor you have given your heart to a dog to tear. We’ve sorrow enough, happiness rare,Car crashes, wars, disease, and despair.Our love, like theirs, is the grip of a vice,Once it attaches, it stays there for Continue Reading →
Posted in No Category by Eran with comments disabled.
The Fourth Step of Enshittification
We already know that AI is ruining the internet and if this trend continues, it’ll turn into a vacuous space with 90% bots posting shit and then replying to each other with other shit. But even without AI in the mix, After watching Jenny Nicholson’s video on the Star Wars Hotel I have become painfully aware of the fourth step of Enshittification. After pandering to the investors at the expense of business partners and actual users of the platform, corporations create groundbreaking, disruptive bullshit NERPS that are only there to entice more investors to invest more so they can grow their market share and capitalization without actually releasing anything that people actually want.I think that’s what all this AI bullshit is doing now, just like the Metaverse bullshit last year or the crypto-nft-blockchain bullshit two years ago. They’re just riding the wave of what’s hot in the industry so speculating assholes with too much money and too little sense give them a higher evaluation and a year or two from now it’ll all fizzle out with nothing to show for it except some die hard fans who’ll swear by it, some gullibles who lost their money, and C-Suite dipshits retiring with a golden parachute.
Posted in Humanity, Practice, Thinking Out Loud by Eran with 2 comments.
Cause and Effect is Learned
Simon Sinek’s guests always have interesting insights about society and practice and Dr. Michael Muthukrishna is no different. What caught me most about this episode is what he said about the most basic function of human fourth-dimensional thinking. I thought the ability to see a series of events and expect the next is just something you get used to. It’s how you teach your automatic motor functions to catch a ball when it’s thrown to you. Apparently, it’s a much more learned phenomenon and not something just inherent to the human existence. I did, in the past, work for an auto-safety initiative in teaching young drivers how to be better faster. The most important thing on that curriculum is the biggest difference between new drivers and experienced ones is the depth and breadth of fourth-dimensional thinking. I explained to them how an experienced driver looks a lot further ahead, takes in the situation, and expects where dangers and obstacles could come from, adjusting their driving accordingly. This also explains the person looking at me as I was riding my bike towards them and their dog blocking the entire road and only clearing some space for me when I stopped and gave them a questioning look.
Posted in Humanity, Thinking Out Loud by Eran with comments disabled.
Ten Out of Ten
In the gaming spheres, scoring is, for some reason, a really big deal. People often go to shaming campaigns if the game they really loved gets a 7 out of 10. First of all, that’s stupid. 7 out of 10 is pretty good. For me, it means mostly fun with a few caveats. 5 is not atrocious but decent if it weren’t for some flaws that should have been fixed. Then there’s the 10 out of 10, also a very fought over score. Because it looks so final. It’s saying, this is the best there is and can ever be. The point is, it’s not. 10 out of 10 is the best that reviewer thinks things can be right now. But then something new comes along that is better. So, consider this: Every time something gets full marks, 5 stars, 10 out of 10, it actually makes every previous 10 out of 10 in their category slightly less 10-ish. It might still count as a 10. If you go back to it at that time, it might be 9, comparatively. That doesn’t diminish its original value. It just means the scale has been expanded. This is true for anything that is an infinite game. A finite game like a school test can have a 100 and no more. But in art, the game is never over.
Posted in Gaming, Philosophy, Practice, Thinking Out Loud by Eran with comments disabled.
The Loss of Nuance
I don’t want to harp too long about this but I felt I had to say something. I am definitely not the first to mourn the loss of nuance in today’s discourse, in everything. It’s all so polarized, when the only options that seem to be available are the two extremes. It’s ok to have a stance but it’s not ok to demonize the other side. It’s ok to hold two opinions that might seem at odds at the same time.
Posted in Humanity, Thinking Out Loud by Eran with comments disabled.
הפרכה זה חשוב
מדע זה לא רק גוף של ידע, זאת דרך מחשבה. קוראים לה ‘השיטה המדעית’ (The Scientific Method). חלק חשוב מהשיטה המדעית היא ‘יכולת הפרכה’ (או Falsifiability). זאת אומרת, מה צריך לקרות, איזה ניסוי עם איזו תוצאה תשמיד את ‘התאוריה’ (Theory) לחלוטין או לפחות תשלח אותה חזרה לאזור ‘ההשערה’ (Hypothesis). כן, גם לתאוריות כמו תאוריות הכבידה יש הפרכה. אם תעשו ניסוי של להחזיק תפוח ואז לעזוב אותו, אבל במקום ליפול הוא ימריא לשמיים, זה יפריך את תאוריית הכבידה. לתאוריות שאין להן הפרכה אנחנו קוראים תיאוריות קונספירציה (כי כל דבר שתגיד להם רק יאשש את התאוריה) או אמונה. למה כל ניפוח השכל הזה? כי הרבה פעמים בהרבה מקומות עכשיו קורה לנו שמגיע אחת עם תיאוריה שאפשר להפריך ואחת עם תיאוריה שאי אפשר להפריך (בדרך כלל על ידי הטענה ש’אלוהים אמר’ או ‘זאת זכותנו הטבעית’ או יותר בכללי, ‘כי ככה’) והן צריכות להגיע לאיזו שהיא הסכמה. אבל אם אי אפשר לדון בטענות, בגורמים, באילו ניסויים אפשר לעשות כדי לדעת מה הדרך הטובה יותר, אי אפשר להתקדם. לא משנה מה תהיה התוצאה, הצד שמייצגת מי שהפסידה (לרוב בגלל שקול אחד יותר היה נגדה) יהיה מאוכזב הרבה יותר מאשר הצד השני. ולמי שלא זוכר, המטרה של פשרה (קרי, דמוקרטיה) היא שכולם יהיו מאוכזבים כמה שיותר במידה שווה. אז, אם אפשר, בחייאת ראבאק, להוציא ממוקדי השלטון את המטורפים הדתיים, החשובים בזכות עצמם, הגזענים צרי האופקים, וכל אלו שלא יכולים להביא הוכחות יוצאות מהכלל לתמוך בטענות שלהם.
Posted in No Category and tagged Democracy, Politics, Religion, Science by Eran with comments disabled.